Up until the 17th Century Royalty controlled
the media until the Industrial Revolution bought about changes. From this
change activists such as the Puritans and Karl Marx started to emerge.
These activists
provided a necessary social debate where parties argued it out in engaging
debates between good and bad. The presses freedom of speech proved to be
what was needed to provide a good and ethical government.
Now we jump forward to
the 21st century where personal computers and the Internet have
provided a new platform for the general public to become involved in media
making and partaking in a participatory culture. Wikileaks fuels this
participatory culture by providing an outlet for whistleblowers. They are not
causing trouble for trouble sake but providing a site to disseminate information.
This transparency of
information I believe reduces government and corporate corruption by just being
there. Knowing there is a body like Wikileaks could make people think twice
about their unethical actions.
Powerful institutions and practices (law,
religion, education, advertising and politics) are being redefined by a growing
recognition of what is being gained through fostering – or at least toleration
through participatory cultures.
As Jenkins said social media is redefining
these institutions. These institutions need to rethink their game plan or be
honest and upfront. Big Brother is out there or maybe we should call Wikileaks
the annoying Little Brother. Julian Assange is not a criminal, no court of law has convicted him of any
criminal act. So
I believe both he and Wikileaks are practicing their
civil rights as derived by Article 19 in the Universal Declaration of Human
Rights (Wikileaks).
everyone has the
right to freedom of opinion and expression; this right includes freedom to hold
opinions without interference and to seek, receive and impart information and
ideas through any media and regardless of frontiers.
P.J Proudon, another 17th Century political / anachist was quoted as saying: To be GOVERNED is to be at every operation, at every
transaction noted, registered, counted, taxed, stamped, measured, numbered,
assessed, licensed, authorized, admonished, prevented, forbidden, reformed,
corrected, punished ... which is a mammoth task for any government or country. So to have Wikileaks and Julian Assange around now and in the future to provide ethical auditing and to keep the bastards honest is reassuring, long live Freedom of Speech.
REFERENCES
Jenkins H, 2006. Fans, Bloggers, and Gamers: Exploring Participatory
Culture Author: Henry Jenkins Publication: New York: New York University Press,
cop. 2006. Viewed 20 January 2014 <www.uoc.edu/uocpapers/4/dt/eng/jenkins2.html>
Only in America, 2013. Edward Snowdon Julian Assange
Do Read. Blogspot. Viewed 20 January 2014. http://onlyinamericablogging.blogspot.com/2013/11/edward-snowden-julian-assange-do-read.html
Proudhon PJ, P. J. Proudhon in the Revolution of 1848, Mary B. Allen The Journal of Modern History
Vol. 24, No. 1 (Mar., 1952), pp. 1-14, viewed 20 January 2014 <http://www.jstor.org/discover/10.2307/1871978?uid=3737536&uid=2134&uid=2&uid=70&uid=4&sid=21103329046911
Vol. 24, No. 1 (Mar., 1952), pp. 1-14, viewed 20 January 2014 <http://www.jstor.org/discover/10.2307/1871978?uid=3737536&uid=2134&uid=2&uid=70&uid=4&sid=21103329046911
Wikileaks, 2014. Why Wikileaks and the Media is
Important, viewed 20 January 2014 <http://wikileaks.org/About.html>
Hi Nicole, I really enjoyed your post on Wikileaks...and the additional history lesson thrown in! You covered off some key elements such as freedom of the press, participatory culture and transparency of information, will still being entertaining.
ReplyDeleteLisa
Thanks Lisa. I think with the net we are always conflicted because it is fairly new. So the history lesson I suppose showed that these issues have always existed in one form or another.
ReplyDelete